Postmodernism Architecture
Beginning in the late 1970s, modernism was no longer seen as relevant or radical. This is when ideas for postmodernism began to make way. Designers during this time began to question whether their designs and architecture could also change styles. There was conflict, specifically in Chicago, with building preservation. The old historic building was being torn down while more modern buildings were taking their place. Some of the buildings that were taking place of the older ones were postmodernist buildings. These buildings had designs that were new. More playful shapes and colors were replacing the drab old architecture. New materials and building structures were also becoming popular. Buildings were begging to take shape (quite literally). The buildings were having sculptures added to give it a more interactive and eye-catching effect. Some buildings were also designed into shapes (as seen down below there is an example of a cat building). This new trend died out like most trends do, but that doesn't mean that these technics are not still used today.
The trend for most arts during the postmodernism era was inspired by everyday objects. Whether it was soup paintings, sculptures of spoons, or buildings shaped like picnic baskets, they all had the same inspiration. Although we do not see our modern buildings taking the shape of our everyday objects, we do see trends from postmodernism. We frequently see buildings with bright finishes along with more interesting textures and materials. Before the postmodernist designs, buildings were square and did not have much personality. Now it is rare to see a building that does not have some sort of architectural flare. It has become normal for building to have unusual dips, jagged corners, and or an odd overall shape. Without this era, we would not have interesting building structures, and this would make looking out the window very boring.
Postmodern architecture is definitely interesting. Beginning my Undergraduate in architecture here at Wentworth has made me appreciate buildings a lot more and you, Lenard, have exemplify postmodern architecture very well! Although its not really my style of choice, I am still fascinated by the creativity it took to create these kinds of buildings. I feel like with all things from the postmodern era, the only way to improve is to stretch ideologies and break the "norms" of what was once confined as drab architecture. As a result from architects being forced to diverge from normativity, we were given cat houses and buildings that look like Lego towers! I also like how you bring up the issue of historical preservation, which I agree with, but to an extent. My thoughts are: how are we supposed to improve if the limits of historical preservation keep us confined? In most cases I think this, but hypocritically support historical preservation on major historical buildings important to the area, not just some abandoned estate.
ReplyDeleteHey Lenard, I also used architecture for my critical analysis piece, but the buildings you analyzed are for sure way cooler. It's so crazy to see what architecture once was and how it has evolved over time. Could you imagine if every single building was a square and looked like each other, that would be one boring world. Although the trend of buildings shaped like objects has died out the concept and styles adapted from that have continued to move forward which is really cool.
ReplyDeleteHey Lenard, I think postmodern architecture was a great analysis topic (I chose the same one) but you definitely found much more unique structures. I'm not sure who would want to live in a cat house, but it does look pretty neat. We had some similar comparisons in our writing about the textures and shapes of buildings from the historic period. I also like how you emphasized the "architectural flair" many structures today have. Although some aren't considered to be postmodern buildings, they definitely echo the same styles due to this era.
ReplyDeleteI think post modern architecture is an extremely interesting aspect of post modernism. I think it is very interesting how architecture through the different eras of art has changed so heavily. Architecture during the post modern era is almost completely opposite to that of the enlightenment era where buildings had only what was deemed "reasonable". Post modern architecture on the other hand is vibrant and creative. This may not seem necessary but when you consider that many of these buildings are peoples place of work a little flair may be necessary to increase productivity. Post modern architecture is not only form of art but the design post modern buildings can be a tool for mood and productivity.
ReplyDeleteI thought that your blog post was very interesting to read. This is a connection that I, personally, would never have thought to write about, so seeing your thoughts on the matter was very cool! I really like the connection you made between postmodernist art and the every day items that inspired artists to create! You did a really good job on this assignment and I look forward to seeing more from you!!
ReplyDelete